Alabama’s F You To The Supreme Court Isn’t Working Out The Way They Hoped

// The state of Alabama is playing a fun game of fuck around with voting rights, and now it looks like they’re finding out. See, they’re ground zero for testing the American justice system’s tolerance for racial  gerrymandering.

Alabama faced a court mandate, backed by the Supreme Court, to create two majority-Black districts or “something quite close to it.” But the GOP-controlled legislature advanced a new, “compromise” map — backed by Alabama GOP Gov. Kay Ivey, saying, “The Legislature knows our state, our people and our districts better than the federal courts or activist groups, and I am pleased that they answered the call, remained focused and produced new districts ahead of the court deadline.” However, unlike the incredibly specific court order, the new map only had one majority-Black district.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

The federal panel seemed pretty pissed about being openly defied. But Alabama went all-in on the gamble the Supreme Court would back them on their racist maps, asking SCOTUS to block the lower court ruling while the state appealed.

Sponsored Announcing Ontra Atlas, Modern Entity Management Built for Private Equity Ontra Atlas extends Ontra’s Legal Operating System, an AI-enabled platform that digitally transforms critical legal workflows. From Ontra  

But for the second time, the Court came down on the side of civil rights activists. Without comment or public dissent, the Supreme Court declined to block the lower court’s ruling, which, again, required a second majority-Black district.

Let’s see if Alabama will heed *this* court order.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

Earlier: Court Rejects Alabama Request To Pretty Please Let It Keep Using Racial Gerrymanders Forever
Federal Panel Tosses Alabama’s Racist Congressional Maps. Again.
Notre Dame Law Professor Has Trouble With Difficult Concept Of Counting To 2
Supreme Court Decisions Only Matter To Republicans When They Go Their Way

Sponsored Sponsored InterAction+ Brings Power Of CRM Software To Law Firms Of All Sizes The only legal CRM with exclusive content from LexisNexis®. From LexisNexis® InterAction+™   Sponsored Pickleball, Pancakes, and PhDs – Balancing Law And Life Think you need to sacrifice one thing for the other? Think again. From Peerpoint   Sponsored Experience AI-Powered Contract Negotiation With Ontra Tired of negotiating and managing routine contracts? Ontra makes the most of human expertise and proprietary AI assistance to automate contracts like never before. From Ethan Beberness   Sponsored InterAction+ Brings Power Of CRM Software To Law Firms Of All Sizes The only legal CRM with exclusive content from LexisNexis®. From LexisNexis® InterAction+™  

Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @[email protected].

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); }); Sponsored Sponsored Lex Machina's Karl Harris On Success With AI Lex Machina CEO Karl Harris weighs in on the future of generative AI in legal tech, and what best positions a company for success. From Ethan Beberness   Sponsored Announcing Ontra Atlas, Modern Entity Management Built for Private Equity Ontra Atlas extends Ontra’s Legal Operating System, an AI-enabled platform that digitally transforms critical legal workflows. From Ontra   Topics

Alabama, Voting Rights Act