Ban on youths carrying guns in emergencies violates Second Amendment, 3rd Circuit rules

  • Home
  • Daily News
  • Ban on youths carrying guns in emergencies…
  • Second Amendment Ban on youths carrying guns in emergencies violates Second Amendment, 3rd Circuit rules
    •  
    • !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Tweet  
    • lang: en_US  
    • reddit_target='law';  
    • Print.

    guns

    Youths who are 18 to 20 years old are among the people protected by the Second Amendment, and they can’t be barred from carrying guns during a state of emergency, a federal appeals court has ruled in a 2-1 decision. (Image from Shutterstock)

    Youths who are 18 to 20 years old are among the people protected by the Second Amendment, and they can’t be barred from carrying guns during a state of emergency, a federal appeals court has ruled in a 2-1 decision.

    The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at Philadelphia ruled Jan. 18 that such a restriction in Pennsylvania violated the Second Amendment. The appeals court looked to historical tradition in evaluating the laws, as required by the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen.

    “We understand that a reasonable debate can be had over allowing young adults to be armed, but the issue before us is a narrow one,” wrote Judge Kent A. Jordan for the majority. “Our question is whether the [Pennsylvania state police] commissioner has borne his burden of proving that evidence of founding-era regulations supports Pennsylvania’s restriction on 18-to-20-year-olds’ Second Amendment rights, and the answer to that is no.”

    Jordan is an appointee of former President George W. Bush.

    Reuters and Bloomberg Law have coverage noted by How Appealing, which also linked to the decision.

    The plaintiffs challenging the law were three Pennsylvania residents, the Second Amendment Foundation and the Firearms Policy Coalition.

    The case is Lara v. Commissioner Pennsylvania State Police.

    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

    Related topics: 3rd Circuit Court | U.S. Supreme Court | States | Constitutional Law | Legal History | Pennsylvania | Second Amendment | Public Interest You might also like:
    • Supreme Court doesn't stop nation's first execution using nitrogen gas
    • Arrested citizen journalist wasn't 'martyr' for journalism, 5th Circuit says in tossing her First Amendment suit
    • Carnegie and Me: Refuting the culture war on American libraries
    • 4th Circuit upholds ordinance requiring gun sellers to distribute suicide prevention information
    • Mexico's suit accusing gun-makers of facilitating gun trafficking isn't barred by immunity shield, 1st Circuit says
    Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.

    Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

    The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

    Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

    Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

    Originally posted on: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/ban-onyouths-carrying-guns-in-emergencies-violate-the-second-amendment-3rd-circuit-rules/?utm_source=feeds&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds