// In a new lawsuit, White & Case has accused a former senior legal assistant of a three-year-long pattern of doctoring her reimbursement requests to induce the firm to pay for $500,000 in improper expenses.

According to the complaint, “Ms. Kim intentionally altered the supporting documents she provided for reimbursement with knowledge that the receipts conveyed materially false information regarding the expenses she actually incurred,”  and that there was the “intent to defraud White & Case and to ensure that she received excess reimbursement from her submissions for personal gain to the detriment of the firm and the firm’s clients.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

As reported by Law.com:

Sponsored GCs: How Effective Is Your Data Tracking And Reporting? Join us on August 3rd to learn from the best. From SpotDraft and Above The Law

Specifically, White & Case is alleging that Kim falsified credit card statements to present personal expenses for clothing, non-work meals and more as reimbursable expenses for work travel and permitted overtime meals.

White & Case said that it launched an audit of Kim’s reimbursement activities in August 2019 and uncovered instances in which she doctored receipts to make certain expenses appear eligible for reimbursement when they otherwise would not have been.

But there’s a lot more here: in 2020, Kim sued the firm for pregnancy discrimination. And her attorney sure thinks those two facts are related:

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

“After more than two years of litigation where Ms. Kim went through these allegations of discrimination and retaliation against White & Case, it’s sad and disappointing that White & Case, rather than taking responsibility for its actions, is filing a retaliation suit to intimidate and scare Ms. Kim,” her attorney Kara Miller of Virginia & Ambinder said Wednesday. “These kinds of tactics will not work. Ms. Kim will continue to the end to pursue her case against White & Case and denies the allegations made against her in the subsequent lawsuit.”

The firm alleges that they discovered she altered the reimbursement documents during discovery in the discrimination lawsuit:

Sponsored Sponsored 3 Ways To Make The Legal Department More Effective And Agile Concrete steps to transform your team into a strategic force. From Conga and Above The Law Sponsored Meet LINK: The Easy Way To Handle All Your Document Workflows On Your Mobile Device In A Single App LINK offers the single-app workflows you need to fully work on your documents and manage your email from your mobile devices, anytime and anywhere. From Above the Law Sponsored What Biglaw Leaders Are Planning For Their Tech Our new survey sheds light on what may be in store for firms. From Wolters Kluwer and Above The Law Sponsored Meet LINK: The Easy Way To Handle All Your Document Workflows On Your Mobile Device In A Single App LINK offers the single-app workflows you need to fully work on your documents and manage your email from your mobile devices, anytime and anywhere. From Above the Law

White & Case said that it launched an audit of Kim’s reimbursement activities in August 2019 and uncovered instances in which she doctored receipts to make certain expenses appear eligible for reimbursement when they otherwise would not have been.

But the firm said that it wasn’t until after she left the firm that it uncovered, during discovery in her original lawsuit, that she had been digitally altering supporting documents to increase the dollar value of her reimbursement requests.

White & Case said that while it only has access to seven credit card statements associated with approximately twenty-three reimbursement requests, Kim made over 1,000 such requests during her six-and-a-half years at the firm.

“The limited information known to the firm strongly indicates that her fraudulent conduct was continuous and pervasive,” it said in the complaint.

Whatever comes of this — or Kim’s discrimination lawsuit — it’s sure to be fascinating to watch from the sidelines.

Earlier: Biglaw Pregnancy Discrimination Suit: Plaintiff Says She Was Told To ‘Keep Her Legs Closed’ To Prevent Pregnancy

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).

Sponsored Sponsored Why This CRM Is Different From The Others The legal CRM software designed entirely by lawyers is now available to the public. See what it can offer your practice. From Matterly and Above The Law Sponsored GCs: How Effective Is Your Data Tracking And Reporting? Join us on August 3rd to learn from the best. From SpotDraft and Above The Law Topics

Expense Reports, Hannah Kim, Pregnancy Discrimination, White & Case