Devin Nunes Had A Good Day In Court. Kind Of.

//

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Devin Nunes’s quest for vengeance against media companies who hurt his wee feefees has largely been in vain. His cases against CNN, McClatchy, and the Washington Post have all run aground, as has his longstanding quest to sue a Twitter cow. But yesterday a court in New York gave him a win of sorts in his defamation suit against NBC for comments made in March of 2021 by liberal host Rachel Maddow.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

While US District Judge Kevin Castel, a George W. Bush appointee, dismissed the case as to two of three allegedly defamatory statements, he found that the former Republican congressman had plausibly alleged that one of Maddow’s statements was both false and made with actual malice under the New York Times v. Sullivan standard.

Sponsored How One Small Firm Lured Top Talent With Biglaw Benefits Richmond’s Byrne Canaan needed to attract elite additions in a tight market. This program made it possible.  From NexFirm

The case, which was originally filed in Texas where no party resides, concerned a story about Nunes receiving a package in December of 2019 from Ukrainian politician Andriy Derkach, who was later sanctioned by the US government for trying to influence the election by falsely smearing Joe Biden.

Giuliani meets with Ukrainian lawmaker Andriy Derkach in Kyiv, Ukraine, Thursday, Dec. 5, 2019. Photo provided by Derkach’s press office.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

Later Nunes released an email demonstrating that he immediately turned the package over to the FBI, but at the time he refused to comment, perhaps loath to discredit the smear operation that Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani was conducting on the future president and his son Hunter Biden.

Maddow’s allegedly defamatory statements suggested that Nunes “accepted a package” from Derkach, that he “refused to hand it over to the FBI,” and that “Republicans have kept Mr. Nunes on as the top Republican on the intelligence committee.” The court dismissed the complaint as to the first and third statements, because they were quite clearly true. As to the second, Nunes points to a Breitbart story quoting Rick Crawford, a Republican member of Congress, as saying:

Sponsored Sponsored The 2022 In-House Compensation Report Is Here! Our most robust survey to date takes you inside the black box of corporate counsel pay. From Above the Law Sponsored How One Small Firm Lured Top Talent With Biglaw Benefits Richmond’s Byrne Canaan needed to attract elite additions in a tight market. This program made it possible.  From NexFirm Sponsored Professional Development Leader H. Sandra Bang on Building a Career and Making an Impact As PD Appreciation Month comes to an end, PLI speaks with program Chair H. Sandra Bang about her impressive career path and advice for those… From PLI Sponsored The 2022 In-House Compensation Report Is Here! Our most robust survey to date takes you inside the black box of corporate counsel pay. From Above the Law

Here’s the thing: it’s standard practice that if you get a package from unknown source in a foreign country, it’s probably a good idea to call the FBI and let them handle it and not handle those packages and don’t open them and go, ‘Hey I wonder what this is? I guess it’s Christmas came early this year.’ No, you follow the protocol, which is you turn that over to the FBI. That’s what happened.

NBC counters with a Politico story suggesting that Nunes had not turned the package over to the FBI. But since that wasn’t in the original pleading, the court will not consider it yet: “NBCU’s argument about actual malice relies on factual inferences that go beyond the pleadings and the segment.

“This Politico article is not cited or referenced in the Complaint, nor is it cited or referenced in the segment. Because the article goes beyond the pleadings and the materials integral thereto, it is not properly considered on a motion to dismiss,” Judge Castel went on. “On this bare record, the Court declines to convert the motion to one for summary judgment.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

It’s a victory, albeit perhaps a temporary one, for the former congressman. So, congrats little Cowpoke. You finally won a round!

Nunes v. NBC Universal Media, Inc. [Docket via Court Listener]

Sponsored Sponsored MyCase And LawPay — Better Together Why small and midsize firms win big in a blockbuster merger. From Above the Law Sponsored Repricing Stock Options During Market Volatility Download this guide to help inform yourself and your clients on the benefits, considerations and mechanics of conducting a stock option repricing. From Morgan Stanley at Work and Above The Law

Elizabeth Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Topics

Defamation, Devin Nunes, Government