Everyone Should Be Grateful For Courtroom Sketch Artists

(Photo via Art Lien)

I do not regularly think about courtroom sketch artists, since they play an ancillary role in the legal arena, and I do not see courtroom sketch artists often in my practice. However, courtroom sketch artists have been discussed recently because a witness in a high-profile case purportedly had issues with how he was depicted in courtroom sketches. Nevertheless, courtroom sketch artists serve a vital role in making court proceedings more accessible to the public, and lawyers should be flattered if a courtroom sketch artist decides to draw a legal professional in the course of their work.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

The last time I thought about courtroom sketch artists was several years ago when I was communicating with an old friend who handled criminal law cases. He texted me a courtroom sketch that showed him in a courtroom handling a criminal matter on behalf of a client. To be completely honest, the sketch did not look too much like my buddy, but it did not take a stretch of the imagination to understand that he was the lawyer being depicted — and depicted very well — in the courtroom sketch.

Sponsored Lexis+ AI: Generative AI Research That Cites Its Sources This new tool will change how you conduct legal research, offering a faster, more adaptable approach. From Ethan Beberness

Seeing my friend in a positive courtroom sketch made me a tad jealous. I wish I worked in a field, or reached such high esteem in the legal profession, that someone would bother to make a courtroom sketch of me! A courtroom sketch can be seen as a sort of status symbol within certain parts of the legal profession. Courtroom sketches demonstrate that a lawyer has succeeded to some degree and is working on high-profile cases for which courtroom sketch artists want to capture the proceedings visually so that people not in the courtroom can see what happened in court.

Some of my lawyer friends recently seemed to suggest that courtroom sketch artists may become obsolete in the near future. Photographs and videos can more accurately capture what happens in court, and although some courthouses do not allow journalists or others to record the proceedings with cameras, these rules are being liberalized as more and more proceedings are televised or captured by photographs and videos.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

However, I think there is good reason to believe that courtroom sketches are here to stay. Perhaps most significantly, some proceedings are simply too sensitive to record with photographs or video or might be negatively impacted if images from the proceedings were widely distributed. Having a courtroom sketch artist draw what happens in the proceedings strikes a delicate balance between publishing what happens in court and protecting the proceedings against negative consequences from photographing or video recording what happens in court.

Moreover, courtroom sketch artists also play a vital gatekeeping role when it comes to covering courtroom proceedings. When the public relies on videos and photographs from court proceedings, the tendency by the producers of these images is to focus on funny moments that do not really have a substantial impact on what is going on. For instance, I recently saw that the media and the public focused on a joke, made by a judge in a high-profile case, which did not have significant bearing on the proceeding itself. Of course, lawyers know that judges like to joke around on the bench (since they have a captive audience with everyone in the courtroom) and that such activity is not at all significant to the proceeding.

Sponsored

Sponsored Lexis+ AI: Generative AI Research That Cites Its Sources This new tool will change how you conduct legal research, offering a faster, more adaptable approach. From Ethan Beberness

Sponsored LawPay Pro Offers Upgraded Time And Billing Essentials AffiniPay’s latest product for the legal community, introduced earlier this year, presents a simple web-based solution for attorneys seeking seamless firm cash flow. From Above the Law

Sponsored Pioneering Ethical, Trustworthy Generative AI For Legal Research As a longstanding leader in legal AI, LexisNexis now pioneers ethical generative AI for legal research, enabling professionals to improve outcomes while upholding responsible AI… From LexisNexis

However, a moment like this can get far too much airtime if everything in a courtroom is captured on video or photographed. Courtroom sketch artists typically do not focus on these trivial moments at a trial and focus instead on the important matters involved in a proceeding. This can make it easier for the public to digest the significant issues of a trial in a way that might not be possible if a flood of information was readily available to the public.

In any event, courtroom sketch artists still have value since they make court proceedings a little more transparent to members of the public who cannot attend a trial themselves. Lawyers should be honored if they are the subject of courtroom sketch artists, even if they disagree with how they are depicted in the sketches.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

Jordan Rothman is a partner of The Rothman Law Firm, a full-service New York and New Jersey law firm. He is also the founder of Student Debt Diaries, a website discussing how he paid off his student loans. You can reach Jordan through email at [email protected].

Everyone Should Be Grateful For Courtroom Sketch Artists

Share

Categories

Share