Is ex-DOJ official facing ethics trial for ‘thought crime’? His election-fraud letter was based on sincerely held belief, lawyer says

  • Home
  • Daily News
  • Is ex-DOJ official facing ethics trial for…
  • Ethics Is ex-DOJ official facing ethics trial for 'thought crime'? His election-fraud letter was based on sincerely held belief, lawyer says
    •  
    • !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Tweet  
    • lang: en_US  
    • reddit_target='law';  
    • Print.

    AP Jeffrey Clark

    Jeffrey Clark, then-assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, speaks during a news conference in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 14, 2020. (Photo by Susan Walsh/The Associated Press)

    A former Department of Justice official accused of drafting a letter with false allegations of election fraud that he hoped to send to Georgia officials did not violate ethics rules, his lawyer said at a disciplinary hearing Tuesday.

    Jeffrey Clark, who was the acting chief of the DOJ’s Civil Division, is facing ethics charges for “”what amounts to a thought crime,” Clark’s lawyer, Harry W. MacDougald, said in an opening statement Tuesday.

    Law360 reported the remark. The Washington Post, Legal Ethics Roundup, Law.com and Reuters are among the other publications with hearing coverage.

    Clark had asked other department officials to sign the letter, but they refused, according to the charges by the District of Columbia Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Clark then told those officials that former President Donald Trump had offered him the job of acting U.S. attorney general, and he was thinking of accepting it if the letter was not sent.

    The two officials, then-Acting Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen and then-Acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue, told Trump that he should expect all the assistant attorneys general to resign if Clark became the acting attorney general. Clark did not get the job.

    Clark’s draft letter claimed that the DOJ had “identified significant concerns that may have impacted the outcome of the election in multiple states, including the state of Georgia.”

    Hamilton P. “Phil” Fox III, the lead prosecuting attorney in the discipline case, said Tuesday during the hearing Clark engaged in “coercive tactics to get this letter sent” and what he was trying to do “was essentially a coup at the Department of Justice,” according to Law360.

    MacDougald emphasized that the letter was never sent, the Washington Post reports.

    “This was an internal debate and an internal disagreement. The letter was never released by Mr. Clark or by the president,” he said. “Mr. Clark did nothing wrong in having a different opinion from his Justice superiors, especially when it was sincerely held, as the evidence will show.”

    Clark is also facing criminal charges in the Georgia election-interference case against Trump.

    The ethics charges allege that Clark tried to engage in conduct involving dishonesty by trying to send the letter with false statements, and that Clark tried to engage in conduct that would seriously interfere with the administration of justice.

    The hearing, which is streaming live on YouTube, is happening before a committee of the D.C. Bar’s Board on Professional Responsibility, which will make a recommendation to the full board if it finds ethics violations, Reuters explains. After action by the full board, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has the final say on discipline.

    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

    Related topics: States | Election Law | Government | Ethics | Attorney General | Georgia | District of Columbia | Federal Government | Bar Associations | Career & Practice | Lawyer Discipline You might also like:
    • Lawyer who stole more than $1M from his law firm gets disbarred
    • Judge recommends conservative lawyer John Eastman be disbarred in California
    • Lawyer's actions in discipline matter lead to worse penalty
    • Lawyer disbarred for filing immigration docs during suspension
    • Lawyer's joint sex with boyfriend and his daughter was 'tantamount to rape,' despite plea deal, disbarment order says
    Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.

    Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

    The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

    Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

    Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

    Originally posted on: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/is-ex-doj-official-facing-ethics-trial-for-a-thought-crime-his-election-fraud-letter-was-based-on-sincerely-held-belief-lawyer-says/?utm_source=feeds&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds