Jan. 6 panel seeks interview with Justice Thomas’ wife after report of correspondence with former Chapman law prof

Home

Daily News

Jan. 6 panel seeks interview with Justice…

Judiciary Jan. 6 panel seeks interview with Justice Thomas' wife after report of correspondence with former Chapman law prof

By Debra Cassens Weiss

June 16, 2022, 12:13 pm CDT

•  
• !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Tweet  
• lang: en_US  
• reddit_target='law';  
• 

Virginia “Ginni” Thomas speaks at the 2017 Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Maryland. Photo by Gage Skidmore, CC-BY-SA-2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

Updated: The chairman of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol riot told reporters Thursday that the panel plans to ask Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, the wife of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, for an interview.

“We think it’s time that we, at some point, invite her to come talk to the committee,” said U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, the committee’s Democratic chairman.

Axios and the Washington Post are among the publications with the news.

Thompson spoke with reporters after the Washington Post reported that Ginni Thomas was said to be more involved with efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election than previously known.

Ginni Thomas told the Daily Caller that she looks forward to speaking with the committee, the Hill reports.

“I can’t wait to clear up misconceptions,” she said.

Ginni Thomas reportedly corresponded with former Chapman University law professor John Eastman, according to the report by the Washington Post. Eastman had argued that then-Vice President Mike Pence was “the ultimate arbiter” in the vote count, and that state lawmakers could override the popular vote and choose Trump electors because of possible election fraud.

The Washington Post’s story is based on three anonymous sources involved in the investigation by the Jan. 6 committee, which obtained email correspondence between Ginni Thomas and Eastman.

Eastman was a former clerk for Thomas. Eastman appeared to have behind-the-scenes information about the Supreme Court when he said in an email after the election that there was a “heated fight” among the justices on whether to hear election litigation, the New York Times reported.

Eastman sent the email to another pro-Trump lawyer and campaign officials.

The email, “if taken at face value, raised the question of how he would have known about internal tension among the justices about dealing with election cases,” the New York Times said.

Previous reports have also shown Ginni Thomas’ involvement in seeking to reject election results. She sent emails pushing 29 Republican state lawmakers in Arizona to choose electors for former President Donald Trump, despite his election loss in the state, the Washington Post reported June 10. The Washington Post had previously reported that she had emailed only two Arizona lawmakers.

Ginni Thomas apparently sent the email using an online platform called freeroots.com, which makes it easy to send form emails to multiple elected officials.

Ginni Thomas also sent texts urging former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to contest the presidential election, according to prior news stories.

Any new revelations about Ginni Thomas’ actions “are likely to further intensify questions about whether Clarence Thomas should recuse himself from cases related to the election and attempts to subvert it,” the Washington Post said.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “If DOJ prosecutes Trump, what charges could it bring? Experts consider possibilities”

ABAJournal.com: “Meet Greg Jacob, Pence lawyer who opposed ‘made up’ election theory, sent ‘furious message’ Jan. 6, 2021”

ABAJournal.com: “Lawyers surrounding Trump rejected stolen election claims; Barr calls claims ‘idiotic’ and ‘disturbing’”

ABAJournal.com: “Rudy Giuliani faces ethics charges in DC over failed election arguments”

ABAJournal.com: “Former Chapman law prof says ex-dean knew of his work for Trump; 2 students were ‘thrilled’ to help”

ABAJournal.com: “Chapman University says it didn’t authorize law prof’s representation of Trump, yet work was on server”

ABAJournal.com: “Prove it up: Scholars criticize law prof’s speech about secret folders and say it was unsupported”

ABAJournal.com: “Ex-law prof advised counting mail-in ballots at ‘prorated amount’ to swing Pennsylvania to Trump”

Updated June 16 at 2:40 p.m. to include Ginni Thomas’ comment to the Daily Caller.

$( document ).ready(function() { var slidesFetched = false; var handleGalleryClick = function() { var $oldItem = $('.gallery_container'); $('.gallery_container .arrows a').click(function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $arrow = $(this); if (! slidesFetched) { $arrow.closest('.gallery_slide').css('opacity', '0.3'); var url = $(this).attr('href').replace('/gallery/', '/gallery/slides/'); $.get(url, function(data) { var $slides = $(data); $slides = $slides.filter('.gallery_container'); $('.gallery_container').replaceWith($slides); $slides = $('.gallery_container'); $slides.find('.arrows a').click(function(e2) { e2.preventDefault(); var $slideWrapper = $(this).closest('.gallery_container'); var $arrowContainer = $(this).closest('.arrows'); if ($arrowContainer.hasClass('previous')) { $slideWrapper.removeClass('active'); $slideWrapper.prev().addClass('active'); } else if ($arrowContainer.hasClass('next')) { $slideWrapper.removeClass('active'); $slideWrapper.next().addClass('active'); } changeSlide($('.cell-'+$(this).attr('data-slideid'))); }); changeSlide($('.cell-'+$arrow.attr('data-slideid'))); slidesFetched = true; }); } changeSlide($('.cell-'+$(this).attr('data-slideid'))); return false; }); var changeSlide = function($cell) { $('.slide-'+$cell.attr('data-slideid')).addClass('active').siblings().removeClass('active'); $cell.addClass('active').siblings().removeClass('active'); moveFilmstripCells($cell); // Hide filmstrip arrows if we're on the first/last slide. if ($('.gallery_container.active').find('.arrows.previous').length > 0) { $('#filmstrip_container .arrows.previous').css('visibility', 'visible'); } else { $('#filmstrip_container .arrows.previous').css('visibility', 'hidden'); } if ($('.gallery_container.active').find('.arrows.next').length > 0) { $('#filmstrip_container .arrows.next').css('visibility', 'visible'); } else { $('#filmstrip_container .arrows.next').css('visibility', 'hidden'); } }; var $cells = $('#filmstrip_container .cell'); var totalCells = $cells.length; var totalVisibleCells = $cells.filter('.visible').length; var pivotPoint = Math.floor(totalVisibleCells / 2); var moveFilmstripCells = function($activeCell) { var $visibleCells = $cells.filter('.visible'); var activeCellIndex = $cells.index($activeCell); var activeCellVisibleIndex = $visibleCells.index($activeCell); var firstVisibleCellIndex = $cells.index($cells.filter('.visible:first')); var lastVisibleCellIndex = $cells.index($cells.filter('.visible:last')); var cellsToMove = 0; var startingPoint = 0; // Do nothing if active cell is at the pivot point. if (activeCellVisibleIndex == pivotPoint) return; // Active cell is left of the pivot point. if (activeCellVisibleIndex < pivotPoint) { // Do nothing if the cell's index and visible index are identical, because that means // we don't have room to shift. if (activeCellIndex