Judge Chutkan Declines To Sanction Special Counsel For Aggravated Filing Stuff

//

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Judge Tanya Chutkan heaved a heavy sigh on the federal docket this afternoon, because, even with his case stayed on appeal, Donald Trump is a giant pain in the ass.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

On January 4, his lawyers John Lauro and Todd Blanche filed a hemorrhoid-shaped motion demanding that the court hold Special Counsel Jack Smith and his deputies Molly Gaston and Thomas Windom in contempt of court for the crime of aggravated filing stuff. Their argument is that the prosecutors are barred from adhering to discovery deadlines by filing pretrial motions or even turning over discovery while the case is being appealed.

Sponsored How This Law Firm Converts 4x More Web Traffic Through Digital Transformation How making one simple change to their website, and no additional marketing spend drove 4x the number of qualified leads through their law firm’s website. From Lawbrokr  

The pleading was typically over-caffeinated:

Unstated, but obvious, is the prosecutors’ desperate effort to harass President Trump and prevent his likely victory in the 2024 Presidential Election. A significant part of this strategy, which the prosecutors have employed from the outset, is to use this case as a platform to advance the Biden Campaign’s dishonest political talking points, including, for example, echoing the false and defamatory claims that President Trump spreads “disinformation.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

And the Special Counsel’s three-page reply was a typically understated “Quit flopping, dorks.” (Slight paraphrase.)

Unsurprisingly Judge Chutkan, will not be imposing contempt sanctions on the prosecution for filing motions. Forced to mediate this bullshit, she simply agreed that “[t]he Stay Order did not clearly and unambiguously prohibit the Government actions to which Defendant objects,” and noted that “merely receiving discovery or an exhibit list” cannot possibly constitute a “meaningful burden” on the former president and his lawyers.

Sponsored Sponsored The Solo & Small Firm Compensation Report Is Here! More than 1,000 small firm lawyers provide a glimpse into their pay. From iManage and Above The Law   Sponsored How This Law Firm Converts 4x More Web Traffic Through Digital Transformation How making one simple change to their website, and no additional marketing spend drove 4x the number of qualified leads through their law firm’s website. From Lawbrokr   Sponsored How 160 Legal Tech Decision-Makers Are Combating Cybersecurity Threats Do law firms recognize the gravity of the challenges they’re facing? From Arctic Wolf and Above The Law   Sponsored The Solo & Small Firm Compensation Report Is Here! More than 1,000 small firm lawyers provide a glimpse into their pay. From iManage and Above The Law  

But she agreed that the special counsel’s motion in limine filed on December 27 imposes at least some burden on defense counsel, insofar as they must conduct a “preliminary review of each substantive motion” to see if it requires them to fire up the waambulence. (Just kidding, they leave the engine running.)

So Jack Smith and his deputies can knock it off for a minute, or at least quit filing stuff without first asking the court, until the DC Circuit gets around to booting Trump back to the trial court.

And considering the beatdown Trump’s lawyer John Sauer took last week before Judges Henderson, Pan, and Childs, that should be any second now. Well, unless Clarence, Sam, Neil, Brett, and Amy get their hooks in it. But barring that …

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

US v. Trump [District Docket via Court Listener]
US v. Trump [Circuit Docket via Court Listener]

Sponsored Sponsored Introducing Lexis® Create – enhanced with Lexis+ AI The only fully integrated legal drafting solution. Lexis Create integrates Practical Guidance, Market Standards, Shepard's, AI-Powered Clause Intelligence, recommendations, and collaboration into drafting. From LexisNexis   Sponsored How to Achieve Quicker, More Valuable Case Settlements with Minimal Effort: A Guide for Personal Injury Lawyers We’re pleased to share the “Top 5 Things Carriers Are Looking for in Demands” — a guide authored by a lawyer with deep experience on… From EvenUp and Above The Law  

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes the Law and Chaos substack and appears on the Opening Arguments podcast.

Topics

Courts, Donald Trump, Government, Tanya Chutkan