Justice Kagan Puts Her Money Where John Roberts’s Mouth Is When It Comes To Supreme Court Ethics

// Elena Kagan LF Justice Elena KaganWhile the Chief Justice assures us that he’s very “committed” to the cause of judicial ethics that he’s blown off for years, Justice Elena Kagan has chosen to do something about it.

Former deputy solicitor general Philip Allen Lacovara flagged Kagan’s “small but real” contribution to the cause of Court legitimacy in a mostly overlooked tidbit in the Court’s May 22 orders list:

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

Kagan Recusal

LawVu Enhances Contract & Matter Functionality With AI Sponsored LawVu Enhances Contract & Matter Functionality With AI LawVu, the category-defining legal workspace for in-house legal teams, today announced the addition of several new AI enhancements to their legal workspace. From LawVu  

In some ways, it’s a big enough deal that a justice recused themselves at all. The justices take the position that the cited Code of Conduct only applies to lower federal courts, rendering it purely advisory for the Supreme Court. This creates some confusing marginal cases as well as very NOT marginal cases like sitting on cases where your — or your wife’s — personal benefactor has business before the Court.

But the important blow Kagan strikes for the cause of legitimacy is in the specificity she offers:

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

First, it appears to hint that at least one justice may be willing to resurrect the type of disclosure that was routine through the end of the nineteenth century but that the court abandoned over a century ago. Specifically, the justices used to offer at least a brief explanation why the justice did not participate in the court’s action.

Since that time, in dozens of cases per year, one or more justices stays out of a matter, but the parties and courtwatchers are left to wonder why—financial investment in one of the parties, personal friendship with the lawyers, prior involvement with the case as counsel or as a lower court judge, or any other reason.

As Lacovara notes, this matter reached the Supreme Court before and Justice Kagan recused herself without offering a reason last time, indicating that she’s adopted a new policy.

Sponsored Artificial Intelligence Saves Lawyers Time And Money While Improving Accessibility Of Data Sponsored Artificial Intelligence Saves Lawyers Time And Money While Improving Accessibility Of Data From Michael Owsley - VIQ Solutions   ChatGPT Draws State Lawmakers’ Attention To AI Sponsored ChatGPT Draws State Lawmakers’ Attention To AI ChatGPT and other AI models have drawn a great deal of public attention since being introduced last year—state lawmakers are taking notice too. From Korey Clark, Editor, State Net Capitol Journal™   LawVu Enhances Contract & Matter Functionality With AI Sponsored LawVu Enhances Contract & Matter Functionality With AI LawVu, the category-defining legal workspace for in-house legal teams, today announced the addition of several new AI enhancements to their legal workspace. From LawVu   The Non-Event Industry Wrap-Up Sponsored The Non-Event Industry Wrap-Up CRM, Virtual Receptionist, Chat and Text Messaging for Law Firms. News from the world of legal tech, featuring Lawmatics and MyCase. From Above the Law  

Perhaps next Tuesday, Justice Thomas will note he “took no part in the consideration of the petition (respondent bought me a Rolex).”

Probably not.

Kagan Takes Small But Real Step Toward High Court Transparency [Bloomberg Law News]

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

Earlier: John Roberts Gaslights Crowd With ‘Commitment’ To Super Secret Supreme Court Ethics Plan He Won’t Talk About
Elena Kagan Uses Footnote To Unleash Surprise Sotomayor Diss Track
Sonia Sotomayor Ruled On Copyright Cases While Disclosing Book Fees Which Is Sort Of Like Years Of Covering Up Yacht Trips And Private School Tuition

Sponsored The Essential Guide to Slack eDiscovery Sponsored The Essential Guide to Slack eDiscovery Someday, you will likely need to extract data from Slack for eDiscovery, compliance, or other purposes. Here's how you can navigate its unique complexities. From Onna and Above The Law   The Non-Event Industry Wrap-Up Sponsored The Non-Event Industry Wrap-Up CRM, Virtual Receptionist, Chat and Text Messaging for Law Firms. News from the world of legal tech, featuring Lawmatics and MyCase. From Above the Law  

HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Topics

Clarence Thomas, Courts, Elena Kagan, John Roberts, Judicial Ethics, Legal Ethics, Supreme Court


Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

Originally posted on: https://abovethelaw.com/2023/05/justice-kagan-supreme-court-ethics-recusal/