//

Ken Paxton

Before the ink was even dry on Justice Alito’s Babies Are God’s Punishment for Whores decision (yes, that is the correct Bluebook citation), Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton swung into action. He immediately issued an advisory opinion promising to enforce Texas laws pre-dating Roe which criminalize abortion and assess civil penalties for both the doctor and the pregnant person.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

“My office is specifically authorized to pursue and recover those civil penalties, and I will strictly enforce this law. Further, we will assist any local prosecutor who pursues criminal charges,” he wrote, adding that “Although these statutes were unenforceable while Roe was on the books, they are still Texas law. Under these pre-Roe statutes, abortion providers could be criminally liable for providing abortions starting today.”

Sponsored 5 Key Strategic Steps For Data Privacy Compliance Legal’s guide to keeping risk management manageable. From wlim

Which led naturally to the question of what he intended to do if our six robed overlords decide to take Justice Thomas’s advice and ditch all of the substantive due process decisions except for Loving v. Virginia, which he’s not too exercised about for some reason.

“For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” he wrote in his Dobbs concurrence. “Because any substantive due process decision is ‘demonstrably erroneous’ we have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.” [Citations omitted.]

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

“Obviously the Lawrence case came from Texas,” asked NewsNation host Leland Vittert in an interview with Paxton on Friday which was flagged by the Houston Chronicle. “Would you as attorney general be comfortable defending a law that once again outlawed sodomy? That questioned Lawrence again or Griswold or gay marriage? That came from the state legislature to put to the test what Justice Thomas said?”

In fact, he would! If the Texas state legislature decides to pass a law banning homosexual sex, or contraception, or gay marriage, then Ken Paxton will happily defend it all the way to the Supreme Court in hopes that Justice Thomas and his merry band of stare decisis slayers will punish filthy sex-havers some more, particularly if both partners have matching sets of boy parts.

Sponsored Sponsored 5 Key Strategic Steps For Data Privacy Compliance Legal’s guide to keeping risk management manageable. From wlim Sponsored 6 Ways Firms Can Win With Legal Tech In An Uncertain Market Now is the time to evaluate your firm’s technology strategy and reconfigure it for the future. From Above the Law Sponsored How to Increase Document Productivity and Efficiency throughout your Legal Drafting Workflow Join us on June 30th to uncover how Law firms and corporate legal departments alike can manage their document workflows effectively and efficiently From Litera and Above The Law Sponsored Your eDiscovery Software Assessment Toolkit Use this as a starting place to identify and capture the key requirements for your organization From Lighthouse and Above The Law

“I mean, there’s all kinds of issues here, but certainly the Supreme Court has stepped into issues that I don’t think there’s any constitutional provision dealing with,” Paxton responded. “They were legislative issues, and this is one of those issues, and there may be more. So it would depend on the issue and dependent on what state law had said at the time.”

GOP #TXAG @KenPaxtonTX said over the weekend that cases like Lawrence v. Texas — which affirmed LGBTQ+ people's right to have sex — should go back to the states. pic.twitter.com/6bwrj22Tz0

— American Bridge 21st Century (@American_Bridge) June 27, 2022

“This is all new territory for us so I’d have to see how the Legislature was laid out and whether we thought we could defend it,” Paxton went on. “Ultimately, if it’s constitutional, we’re going to go defend it.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

Make no mistake, they’re coming for all your rights. The mask is off, and so are the gloves.

Attorney General Ken Paxton says he will defend Texas sodomy law if Supreme Court revisits Lawrence vs. Texas [Houston Chronicle]

Sponsored Sponsored The Benefits From A Small Business Credit Card Earn up to $750 bonus cash back with the right Business Credit Card. From Brittany Cianflone Sponsored Your eDiscovery Software Assessment Toolkit Use this as a starting place to identify and capture the key requirements for your organization From Lighthouse and Above The Law

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Topics

Courts, Government, Ken Paxton, Supreme Court