Prominent D.C. Attorney’s Traffic Pet Peeve Gets Average Joe Out Of $60 Ticket

// Traffic Ticket Violation Police CrimeAttorney Mark Zaid is best known for his national security and whistleblower work, but he has a particular penchant for at least some traffic court cases. As reported by the Washington Post, he waived his $600/hr fee to fight the traffic ticket of 24-year-old data analyst Jonathan Tishman.

Tishman’s $60 ticket — for improper use of his high beams — is something of a personal crusade for Zaid. Before the case was called in traffic court, he told Tishman, “It’s about what’s right, what’s just, what’s fair. It’s also, for me, what’s fun.” And, Zaid fought a similar ticket he was issued in 2009 (and won, when the trooper failed to show up for the hearing).

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

So, why was Tishman given the ticket?

Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Sponsored Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Explore new data on how modern law firms are managing their work. From Filevine and Above The Law

The allegations were thus:
About 5:48 p.m. on Jan. 17, 2022, Tishman was driving his Nissan Maxima east on the Capital Beltway, near Wheaton, in the second lane from the left.

A slower-moving car, to his left, suddenly cut him off by veering right in front of him, according to Tishman. He hit his brakes and flashed his high beams twice — doing so to both to warn the driver and out of frustration, Tishman said in an interview.

A trooper who was apparently behind him turned on his flashers and pulled Tishman over. The ticket stated his offense: “Driver Failure to Use Multiple-Beam Road Lighting Equipment at Level Required for Safe Driving.”

Zaid was prepared to argue that the trooper in this case misinterpreted the statutory interpretation of “use”:

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

For Zaid and Tishman, the case came down to the trooper’s misinterpretation of the word “use.” Maryland law, which does indeed speak to high-beam use while behind another motorist, was never written to apply to quick flashes that drivers do all the time, they asserted.

But when the trooper in Tishman’s case also didn’t show up to court, Tishman beat the ticket without having to test Zaid’s legal theory. Which may have been a good thing:

Sponsored Understanding Big Law: A Must-Read Guide To One Of The Most Challenging Workplaces In The World Is Now Available Sponsored Understanding Big Law: A Must-Read Guide To One Of The Most Challenging Workplaces In The World Is Now Available From Elizabeth M. Bennett Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Sponsored Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Explore new data on how modern law firms are managing their work. From Filevine and Above The Law The Global Legal News You Need, When You Need It Sponsored The Global Legal News You Need, When You Need It News and analysis from this company could be a game-changer for legal professionals working globally. From Ethan Beberness Why CRM Is An Essential Tech Tool For Law Firms In 2023 Sponsored Why CRM Is An Essential Tech Tool For Law Firms In 2023 CRMs are powerful tools to help law firms grow and scale without needing more staff. Read on for a brief overview of the basic benefits… From Brittany Cianflone

District Judge Michael O. Glynn III finally asked Tishman how he was pleading — not guilty was the answer — and given there was no testimony against Tishman, the judge found him not guilty. His traffic docket done, he and Zaid informally discussed what the attorney was prepared to argue.

“Now that it’s over, what was it?” Glynn asked.

Zaid told him about the briefly flashed high beams, and how it was an awfully quick use of “use.” “Just a flashing?”

Glynn hinted he might have seen things differently.

“Well, we would have fun with it,” Zaid said.

At least for Tishman, getting out of the ticket is probably fun enough.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @[email protected].

Sponsored What Do Millennials Think Of Law Firm Life? Sponsored What Do Millennials Think Of Law Firm Life? We want to know your views on law firm policies and culture. From Above The Law Why CRM Is An Essential Tech Tool For Law Firms In 2023 Sponsored Why CRM Is An Essential Tech Tool For Law Firms In 2023 CRMs are powerful tools to help law firms grow and scale without needing more staff. Read on for a brief overview of the basic benefits… From Brittany Cianflone Topics

Courts, Mark Zaid, Traffic Tickets


Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

Originally posted on: https://abovethelaw.com/2023/03/prominent-d-c-attorneys-traffic-pet-peeve-gets-average-joe-out-of-60-ticket/