Quinn Emanuel Proposes Using Time Travel To Avoid Sanctions Motion

// 997242Elon Musk’s companies create robot cars (that unexpectedly blow up) and spaceships (that unexpectedly blow up), but now his attorneys are proposing a time machine to get out of — part of — a sanctions motion filed last week.

Feel free to guess what comes next.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

Most of the coverage surrounding the sanctions motion (including Above the Law’s) focused on Musk’s disastrous deposition, defended by Quinn Emanuel’s Alex Spiro despite not being admitted in Texas — either outright or pro hac vice. Spiro, who told the New Yorker last year that his photographic memory is the source of his legal prowess, apparently failed to turn that memory toward the Texas rules as the transcript is littered with warnings from plaintiff Benjamin Brody’s attorney, Mark Bankston of Farrar & Ball, that Spiro kept breaching local rules.

Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now Sponsored Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now If 2023 introduced legal professionals to generative AI, then 2024 will be when law firms start adapting to utilize it. Things are moving fast, so… From LexisNexis  

But aside from the deposition, the sanctions motion also noted that Spiro is the sole signatory on the motion to dismiss the case without being admitted. That’s generally frowned upon as the unauthorized practice of law in most jurisdictions. It’s also a bizarre unforced error since Musk has local counsel in this case. Specifically, Quinn Emanuel’s John Bash, the former US Attorney who Rod Rosenstein notably ordered to push ahead with Trump’s child kidnapping plot who could’ve signed the motion way back in January and avoided this whole ethical kerfuffle.

But the past is the past… OR IS IT?

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

Screenshot 2024-04-16 at 9.23.09 AM

Bash, a Scalia and Kavanaugh clerk, takes the originalist penchant for rewriting history to new heights with this “Motion for a Mulligan,” asking the court to ignore Spiro’s signature and just assume Bash had signed it all along. On the one hand, you can argue that it’s Quinn Emanuel either way, so no harm no foul, right? On the other hand, it’s Quinn Emanuel either way so the firm should be held to an even higher standard since this is the most avoidable cock up ever.

Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Learn how emerging tools will likely change and enhance the work of lawyers for years to come in this new report. From Thomson Reuters   Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now Sponsored Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now If 2023 introduced legal professionals to generative AI, then 2024 will be when law firms start adapting to utilize it. Things are moving fast, so… From LexisNexis   Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve Sponsored Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve The rise of remote work has dramatically reshaped the relationship between Lawyers and Law Firms, see how Scale LLP has taken the steps to get… From The Team at Scale LLP   How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Learn how emerging tools will likely change and enhance the work of lawyers for years to come in this new report. From Thomson Reuters  

Can Musk’s lawyers just wave their hands and pretend those past legal documents just don’t exist? Wait… it feels like we’ve done all this before. Remember Musk joking about buying Twitter and waiving due diligence and then trying to back out by saying the agreement he signed shouldn’t count?

How did that work out?

Earlier: Is Elon Musk About To Get Quinn Emanuel Sanctioned?

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Sponsored Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance Sponsored Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance In this CLE-eligible webinar, we’ll explore the most common accounting pitfalls and how to avoid them for your firm. From Pilot and Above The Law   Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace Sponsored Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace How to best leverage generative AI as an early adopter with ethical use. From LexisNexis   Topics

Alex Spiro, Elon Musk, John Bash, Legal Ethics, Mark Bankston, Quinn Emanuel


Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

Originally posted on: https://abovethelaw.com/2024/04/quinn-emanuel-proposes-using-time-travel-to-avoid-sanctions-motion/