Response to fake-citations query implicates attorney-client privilege, Michael Cohen’s lawyer says

  • Home
  • Daily News
  • Response to fake-citations query implicates…
  • Ethics Response to fake-citations query implicates attorney-client privilege, Michael Cohen's lawyer says
    •  
    • !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Tweet  
    • lang: en_US  
    • reddit_target='law';  
    • Print.

    AP Michael Cohen October 2023_600px

    Michael Cohen, who was once a lawyer for former President Donald Trump, exits the courtroom of Trump’s civil business fraud trial at the New York Supreme Court in New York in October. Photo by Yuki Iwamura/The Associated Press.

    A federal judge who threatened to impose sanctions against former lawyer Michael Cohen’s attorney for apparently citing fake cases has agreed that the lawyer can file his response under seal—at least for now.

    U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York temporarily sealed the response Monday, after lawyer David M. Schwartz said in a letter motion his submission, a sworn declaration, “implicates the confidentiality of the attorney-client privilege.”

    “Given that the issues implicate” Cohen, Furman said in his Dec. 18 order, he will give Cohen and his new lawyer, E. Danya Perry, until Dec. 28 to respond to Schwartz’s sealed court filing.

    Perry, a lawyer with Perry Law, represents Cohen in the civil fraud trial against former President Donald Trump.

    Perry had advised the court in a footnote that she was unable to verify three cases cited by Schwartz, a lawyer with Gerstman Schwartz, in a legal brief seeking to end Cohen’s supervised release.

    That led Furman to issue a Dec. 12 order to show cause why Schwartz shouldn’t be sanctioned for citing cases that appear to be nonexistent.

    Cohen and Perry should address the substance of Schwartz’s filing, whether Schwartz’s disclosures violate attorney-client privilege and whether they should remain under seal, Furman said.

    Schwartz is now represented by his own lawyer in the matter, Bloomberg Law reports.

    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

    Related topics: States | Trials & Litigation | Judiciary | Ethics | New York | Civil Procedure | Career & Practice | Client Protection | Court Administration | Litigation Management You might also like:
    • Lawyer posted nude photos on public docket to humiliate and pressure opponent, federal judge concludes
    • Lawyer for Michael Cohen apparently cited nonexistent cases, judge says; new counsel pointed out problem
    • Navigating family law cases requires an abundance of one thing: respect
    • ABA seeks to toss suit over limited data breach, saying allegations based on 'implausible assertion'
    • Justice Thomas has 'serious doubts' about binding nature of mass-tort bellwether trials
    Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.

    Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

    The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

    Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

    Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

    Originally posted on: https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/michael-cohens-lawyer-says-response-to-fake-citations-query-implicates-attorney-client-privilege/?utm_source=feeds&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=site_rss_feeds