Smartmatic Attorneys Demand $546K In FAFO Money From Mike Lindell And His Lawyers

//

(Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Mike Lindell’s pillows will have just a little less stuffing in them pretty soon thanks to his legal shenanigans. The MyPillow magnate’s litigation strategies have been approximately as sound as his electoral fraud claims — which is to say that they were batshit — and that may wind up costing him bigly.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

After Dominion Voting Systems sued him for defamation in DC federal court, Lindell and his company filed a counterclaim against Dominion and its direct competitor, Smartmatic, alleging civil RICO and defamation. And he filed it in the District of Minnesota, obviously.

Sponsored Upcoming CLE Deadline? Make PLI.edu Your One Stop For All Things Compliance PLI makes compliance easy so you can get back to your practice. Log in to seamlessly track your progress and stream the CLE credits you… From PLI

US District Judge Patrick Schlitz declined Lindell’s invitation to punish Dominion Voting Systems for the tort of suing Mike Lindell, and transferred the case to DC, at which point Smartmatic warned that it was going to request Rule 11 sanctions against Lindell and his lawyers. But these brain geniuses ignored the threat, and instead dismissed their claims against Smartmatic, then added the company back as third party defendant in the pending Dominion case. Only this time on top of the RICO libelslander allegations, Lindell accused Smartmatic of witness tampering via cease and desist letters sent to people making false claims about the company.

Last week Judge Carl J. Nichols had enough. He not only granted Smartmatic’s motion to dismiss, but he also agreed to sanction Lindell, his company, and his lawyers Douglas A. Daniels and Heath A. Novosad, both of whom have already withdrawn from the case.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

“In particular, the Court concludes that at the very least Lindell’s claim against Smartmatic under the Support or Advocacy Clause falls on the frivolous side of the line (other claims do too),” he wrote. “As a result, the Court orders Lindell and his previous counsel to pay some of the fees and costs Smartmatic has incurred defending itself and moving for sanctions under Rule 11.”

The court invited Smartmatic to make its case for damages, and on Friday, the Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, LLP attorneys did just that.

Sponsored Sponsored A Summer Associate’s Guide To Thriving In The Biglaw Spotlight Congrats On Being A Summer Associate! Now Don’t F**k It Up. From Kinney Recruiting Sponsored How Visionary GCs Can Find The Ideal Risk-Revenue Balance Can your legal team be an active driver of your organization’s revenue lifecycle management? Read on to find out. From Above The Law and Conga Sponsored Successful Finance Practice In New York Seeks Mid to Senior Finance Associate Attorney Four years experience representing lenders and / or borrowers required. Apply within. From KINNEY RECRUITING Sponsored How Visionary GCs Can Find The Ideal Risk-Revenue Balance Can your legal team be an active driver of your organization’s revenue lifecycle management? Read on to find out. From Above The Law and Conga

“Smartmatic seeks an award of at least $546,156 for reasonable legal fees for 1168.6 hours of work investigating, researching, and drafting several complex motions, plus $400 in costs,” they argue, describing the figure as an 18.4 percent haircut off the actual time expended, in deference to Judge Nichols’s finding that only “some” of Lindell’s claims were entirely frivolous.

But they hasten to add that if Judge Nichols wants to make an example of this pillow pumping bozo with his $2 billion RICO LOLsuit, they’ll gladly take the whole amount.

Thus, although Smartmatic recognizes that the Court is inclined to award “some” fees and that the lodestar below is presumptively reasonable, the Court could go higher and award up to $658,646.73 within the confines of Rule 11. If ever there were a case to apply the full force of Rule 11, it is this one.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

They also observe in a footnote that only Lindell’s lawyers — i.e. not their client — are on the hook for making facially frivolous arguments in a pleading in violation Rule 11(b)(2).

Mistakes were made. The only question remaining is, exactly how expensive those mistakes are going to be.

Sponsored Sponsored Upcoming CLE Deadline? Make PLI.edu Your One Stop For All Things Compliance PLI makes compliance easy so you can get back to your practice. Log in to seamlessly track your progress and stream the CLE credits you… From PLI Sponsored Why Annual Budgeting Isn’t Enough Anymore The how, what, and when of legal forecasting From Above The Law and Axiom

And, hey, PS: If Smartmatic is getting sanctions and fees from Lindell and his attorneys, then you can bet your bottom dollar Dominion is going to ask for a whole lot more than $546,000 when this preposterous clusterfuckery finally comes to an end.

US Dominion Inc. v. MyPillow Inc. [Docket via Court Listener]

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Topics

Carl Nichols, Defamation, Dominion Voting Systems, Election Law, Government, Mike Lindell, Patrick Schlitz, RICO, Smartmatic