State can’t rely on ‘gossamers of speculation’ to justify ban on gun marketing to minors, 9th Circuit says

Home

Daily News

State can't rely on 'gossamers of speculation'…

First Amendment State can't rely on 'gossamers of speculation' to justify ban on gun marketing to minors, 9th Circuit says

By Debra Cassens Weiss

September 14, 2023, 1:29 pm CDT

•  
• !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); Tweet  
• lang: en_US  
• reddit_target='law';  
• 

“California cannot lean on gossamers of speculation to weave an evidence-free narrative that its law curbing the First Amendment ‘significantly’ decreases unlawful gun use among minors,” wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee. Image from Shutterstock.

A law that bans truthful firearms advertising that appeals to minors should be blocked, a federal appeals court has ruled.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco ruled in a Sept. 13 opinion that plaintiffs challenging the law were likely to prevail on their First Amendment argument.

Reuters and Courthouse News Service have coverage.

“California cannot straitjacket the First Amendment by, on the one hand, allowing minors to possess and use firearms and then, on the other hand, banning truthful advertisements about that lawful use of firearms,” wrote Judge Kenneth K. Lee for the panel.

There is no evidence on the record that a minor has ever illegally purchased a gun, or that truthful ads encourage illegal or violent gun use by minors, the opinion said.

“Simply put, California cannot lean on gossamers of speculation to weave an evidence-free narrative that its law curbing the First Amendment ‘significantly’ decreases unlawful gun use among minors,” wrote Lee, an appointee of former President Donald Trump.

The California law bans advertising of firearm-related products “in a manner that is designed, intended or reasonably appears to be attractive to minors.”

The case is Junior Sports Magazines Inc. v. Bonta.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Related topics: 9th Circuit Court | States | First Amendment | Constitutional Law | Family Law | Trials & Litigation | Advertising Law | California | Second Amendment | Public Interest | Children You might also like:

• Ex-BigLaw partner shown in tirade videos sues influencer for allegedly destroying his career
• Family First: A group of Washington lawyers works to keep infants with their mothers
• Alabama can enforce ban on transition treatment for transgender minors, 11th Circuit says
• Was slap that left mark child abuse? Suspended judge who sought to hide son's act didn't think so

Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.