Steve Bannon guilty? The devil you say!

No, not the devil, a jury of twelve of his peers in DC, which is functionally the same thing if you watch Fox News. And it didn’t take them long to decide, either.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

Trump posted clip today of Mark Levin saying he won’t get a fair trial in DC because the jurors are all Democrats: “How in the hell (is he) gonna get a fair trial? This whole thing is rigged. It’s a disgrace .. Why don’t they hold it in Utah, or Idaho, or some place like that.” pic.twitter.com/bt2uOoqY8j

— Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 (@RonFilipkowski) July 17, 2022

// Sponsored GCs: How Effective Is Your Data Tracking And Reporting? Join us on August 3rd to learn from the best. From SpotDraft and Above The Law

This afternoon, after less than three hours of deliberation, the jury of eight men and four women found the podcaster guilty on both counts of contempt of Congress after he defied subpoenas for documents and testimony from the January 6 Select Committee.

Bannon’s argument that he hadn’t finished contempt-ing, since he offered a couple of weeks ago to come in and testify, failed to impress the jury, even though the defendant wore several of his luckiest shirts to court each day. This and vague insinuations of bias because a congressional lawyer and one of the prosecutors used to be in a book club together were all that the defense had to offer after Judge Carl Nichols blocked Bannon’s plan to turn his case into “the misdemeanor from hell for Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

Even after he’d rested his case yesterday, Bannon’s lawyer David Schoen was begging the court to reconsider its refusal to allow him to put members of Congress on the witness stand.

“We’re not greedy, Your Honor,” he wheedled, asking the court to at least grant him access to Committee Chair Bennie Thompson. But to no avail.

Sponsored Sponsored GCs: How Effective Is Your Data Tracking And Reporting? Join us on August 3rd to learn from the best. From SpotDraft and Above The Law Sponsored Meet LINK: The Easy Way To Handle All Your Document Workflows On Your Mobile Device In A Single App LINK offers the single-app workflows you need to fully work on your documents and manage your email from your mobile devices, anytime and anywhere. From Above the Law Sponsored What Biglaw Leaders Are Planning For Their Tech Our new survey sheds light on what may be in store for firms. From Wolters Kluwer and Above The Law Sponsored 3 Ways To Make The Legal Department More Effective And Agile Concrete steps to transform your team into a strategic force. From Conga and Above The Law

Schoen, who argued the case along with Baltimore attorney Evan Corcoran, seemed genuinely shocked last week when Nichols, a Trump appointee, blocked him from presenting his various mistake of law defenses, just because there is binding Circuit precedent on-point. Did he not get the memo from SCOTUS that stare decisis is basically optional now?

“What’s the point of going to trial if there are no defenses?” Schoen wondered, dejectedly.

And so, in the main, he didn’t. The defense presented no witnesses, and its brief closing statement consisted mainly of the book club silliness plus some bizarre feint at signature matching.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

Bannon lawyer is trying to compare Thompson's fancy slow signature to his quick one.

Judge Carl Nichols evidently didn't like that, Bannon lawyer immediately moves on after the sidebar. pic.twitter.com/iRgGTZhPzw

— Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) July 22, 2022

“The subpoena to Stephen Bannon was not an invitation that could be rejected or ignored,” US Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew M. Graves said today. “Mr. Bannon had an obligation to appear before the House Select Committee to give testimony and provide documents. His refusal to do so was deliberate and now a jury has found that he must pay the consequences.”

Sponsored Sponsored Why This CRM Is Different From The Others The legal CRM software designed entirely by lawyers is now available to the public. See what it can offer your practice. From Matterly and Above The Law Sponsored 3 Ways To Make The Legal Department More Effective And Agile Concrete steps to transform your team into a strategic force. From Conga and Above The Law

Bannon, who will be sentenced on October 21, appears to be betting all his chips on an appeal. In an attempt to ensure that their client will not “pay the consequences,” his lawyers will doubtless be marching into the DC Circuit to argue that Judge Nichols erred by not postponing the trial, by not allowing him to confront his congressional “accusers,” by barring his mistake of law defenses, by not allowing him to subpoena the Justice Department for its internal charging deliberations, and God only knows what else.

Or barring that, he’d accept a pardon. Again.

And here’s Bannon on the courthouse steps, after refusing to testify to Congress and opting not to take the stand at his own trial, excoriating the “gutless members of that show trial committee” for declining to “come down here and testify in open court.”

Bannon: I only have one disappointment and that is the gutless members of that show trial committee, the J 6 committee, didn't have the guts to come down here and testify in open court. pic.twitter.com/rWbrfzUpSD

— Acyn (@Acyn) July 22, 2022

Arrest this man for the murder of irony.

US v. Bannon [Docket via Court Listener]

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

Topics

Capitol riot, Carl Nichols, Crime, David Schoen, Evan Corcoran, Government, Steve Bannon