The Drawbacks Of Life Tenure

(Photo by Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States via Getty Images)

On the one hand, giving federal judges life tenure is a good idea. Life tenure insulates judges from politics and frees them from fear of retribution.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

On the other hand, giving federal judges life tenure is a bad idea. Judges become lazy, and they stay on the bench until well after their “sell by” date.

Sponsored MyCase And LawPay — Better Together Why small and midsize firms win big in a blockbuster merger. From Above the Law

Justices Thomas and Alito prompted my recent thinking about life tenure. Justice Thomas’s wife is active in conservative groups, and he chooses not to recuse himself in cases affecting the interests of those groups. Justice Alito may have leaked a draft Supreme Court decision, although he denies it. Neither justice can be punished for their conduct (or even threatened with punishment, frankly).

It’s not clear that refusing to recuse yourself or allegedly leaking a decision is a high crime or misdemeanor; I suspect not. The justices have thus probably not committed impeachable offenses. Even if the justices had committed impeachable offenses, more than one-third of the Senate is in Republican hands, and there’s a Democratic president, so it’s inconceivable that the Senate would ever vote to convict.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

But what about lesser offenses?

I’ve heard stories, for example, about court rules that required federal judges to fly only in coach while on court business. Some judges consistently flew first class: “It’s not a high crime or misdemeanor. What are they going to do to me?”

Sponsored Sponsored MyCase And LawPay — Better Together Why small and midsize firms win big in a blockbuster merger. From Above the Law Sponsored The View from Inside: How In-House Leaders Can Improve Department Dissatisfaction and Mitigate Attrition Here’s the bottom line: if you are a GC or in-house legal leader, more than half of your legal team should be considered a flight… From Axiom and Above The Law Sponsored Thomson Reuters’ Practical Law — The Journal: Transactions & Business Explore decentralized finance, ESG-driven divestments, supply chain disruptions, and much more with the help of Practical Law’s over 300 attorney editors.   From Above the Law and Thomson Reuters Sponsored From Equity Management to Liquidity: How Morgan Stanley at Work Is Supporting Top Law Firms Read on to learn how empowering your clients with equity solutions can set them and their employees up for success. From Stephanie Wilkins

I’ve heard of court rules that required judges to hand down all decisions in a timely fashion — say, 90 days after an appellate case was argued. Some judges simply disregarded that rule, holding opinions for literally years after argument.  Again: “It’s not a high crime or misdemeanor. What are they going to do to me?”

These are of course procedural rules, governing judges’ conduct.

We would never approve of rules that affected the substance of decisions. We would reject any rule that provided, for example: “The judge must always rule for the plaintiff in a lawsuit” or “the judge must always adopt the conservative position when deciding a case.” Those rules would truly gut judicial independence.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

But it would certainly be nice if there were some way to protect judicial independence while simultaneously requiring judges to work conscientiously, retire from the bench at a reasonable age, fly coach for short trips, and hand down decisions on time.

Maybe the framers of the Constitution should have thought a little harder.

Sponsored Sponsored Looking For A Turnkey Solution To Move Your Law Firm To The Cloud? You can have fast, secure access to your files and applications from anywhere without having to learn anything new or purchase upgraded hardware. Here’s how. From Above the Law Sponsored From Equity Management to Liquidity: How Morgan Stanley at Work Is Supporting Top Law Firms Read on to learn how empowering your clients with equity solutions can set them and their employees up for success. From Stephanie Wilkins

Mark Herrmann spent 17 years as a partner at a leading international law firm and is now deputy general counsel at a large international company. He is the author of The Curmudgeon’s Guide to Practicing Law and Drug and Device Product Liability Litigation Strategy (affiliate links). You can reach him by email at [email protected].

Topics

Courts, Federal Judges, Mark Herrmann, Supreme Court