// Many know TikTok as the dancing app that Gen Z’ers use to get their news. In what may be the near future, it could be the known as the reason you or one of your friends is currently serving a 20-year jail sentence. It has come under fire as a security concern in several states — several of them do not allow government employees to even download the app on to their devices. Resistance against the banning of TikTok has been readily framed as a free speech issue, but the real danger is what the banning mechanism could do to (what remains of) our right to privacy. From Hot Hardware:

Ultimately the problem is not with the idea of banning TikTok. The problem comes in with all of the other powers that this bill gives the government. Senate bill 686 is formally known as the “Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology” (RESTRICT) act. The act gives the government ridiculously wide-reaching powers with little oversight. This allows the government to control and censor information and imposes heavy penalties on people that attempt to avoid these powers.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); }); The scope of the powers that Bill 686 would give the government feels like the Patriot Act all over again. Quick recap: After 9/11 happened, Congress passed a huge bill that no one read — there literally wasn’t enough time in the interval between the event and the Patriot Act’s passing for anyone except ChatGPT 5 to read the damned thing — the government used the specter of terrorism to basically do away with that little requirement of probable cause before they went to snooping around in people’s lives. This bill appears to do the same. Sponsored Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Explore new data on how modern law firms are managing their work. From Filevine and Above The Law  

Believe it or not, it gets even worse: If you find you in violation, they can put you in jail for 20 years, fine you $1M, and seize your property.

They can also deem any foreign government an adversary without informing congress and everything they do is not subjected to FOIA. pic.twitter.com/3F3VTJrl5x

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) March 28, 2023

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

It is difficult to understate how globally this act would permit the government to snoop on whomever they find in violation of it. Anything that connects to the internet is fair game —  your phone, your smart thermostat — anything.

It’s might as well have been written by the intelligence agencies as a full takeover of the federal government.

— Doochebag (@MalcolmRenoldz) March 28, 2023

Sponsored Sponsored The Global Legal News You Need, When You Need It News and analysis from this company could be a game-changer for legal professionals working globally. From Ethan Beberness   Sponsored Navigating Economic Uncertainty: 6 Tips To Keep Your Investments On Track How you can get through current challenges while advancing long-term goals. From Trion Properties   Sponsored Introducing Filevine’s 2023 Customer Benchmark Report Explore new data on how modern law firms are managing their work. From Filevine and Above The Law   Sponsored The Global Legal News You Need, When You Need It News and analysis from this company could be a game-changer for legal professionals working globally. From Ethan Beberness  

It’s a really rough week for anyone using a VPN out there.

Senate Bill 686, The Restrict Act, wants to put you in jail for 20 years for using a VPN for using a website or app is operated by a “foreign adversaries.” These are the foreign adversaries btw pic.twitter.com/v05Hs3B4oJ

— Lolo (@LolOverruled) March 27, 2023

These changes are daunting in the abstract and concretizing them doesn’t help a bit. We know a third of TikTokers use it as a news source. Twitter was also used as a news source before Walmart brand Tony Stark bought it and started messing with its verification systems. Folks have been scrambling to figure out what the new platform would be if everyone jumps bird — are normies savvy enough figure out Reddit and Mastodon?

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

They might have to hurry up with the learning curve; Twitter is dropping the legacy verification system come April 1st, and tweeting news sources could lose some reliability in all of the hubbub. Some knowledge-hungry undergrad uses a VPN to find a TikTok explaining a current event? 20 years minimum. Easy enough you say, just delete TikTok! Okay, and then what? How can the average person know which news source is or isn’t on the government’s surveillance hit list?  You’d have an easier time figuring out if you work for Twitter.

The Proposed RESTRICT Act Could End The Internet And Freedom As We Know It [Hot Hardware]

Sponsored Sponsored You, Too, Can ‘Recession Proof’ Your Firm. Here’s How. With today’s practice management tech, it’s easier than you think. Download our free Practice Management Buyer’s Guide here. From Above the Law   Sponsored Making History With Shepard’s Citations From Ethan Beberness  

Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email  at  [email protected] and by tweet at @WritesForRent.

Topics

Citizen Surveillance, Patriot Act, Senate Bill 686, Technology, TikTok