Trump Attorneys Try To Pander To Justice Kavanaugh, Fail

// angry brett kavanaugh

(Photo by MELINA MARA/AFP/Getty Images)

Listen, I get the impulse. When briefing and arguing before a judge, one of the most compelling citations you can use is the jurist’s own words. And that’s only supercharged in front of the Supreme Court, when the justices have the power to turn their musings into law. But beware! Sloppy research can lead to an embarrassing situation — as Donald Trump’s attorneys are finding out.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

Trump’s attempt to get absolute immunity has hit the Supreme Court. His crackerjack legal team is arguing, “The president cannot function, and the presidency itself cannot retain its vital independence, if the president faces criminal prosecution for official acts once he leaves office.” To advance that point, the MAGA attorneys cite an old Minnesota Law Review article authored by none other than Justice Brett Kavanaugh. They cite the line “a President who is concerned about an ongoing criminal investigation is almost inevitably going to do a worse job as President.”

How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Learn how emerging tools will likely change and enhance the work of lawyers for years to come in this new report. From Thomson Reuters  

But there’s a pretty big problem here — the evidence they cite doesn’t conclude for them. Kavanaugh specifically wrote that a FORMER president, you know, like Donald Trump, CAN face prosecution. The article continues past what Trump’s team cites to say, “The point is not to put the President above the law or to eliminate checks on the President, but simply to defer litigation and investigations until the President is out of office.” Which very much cuts against Trump’s argument.

As NYU Law professor Ryan Goodman noted on a CNN appearance, this could easily backfire on Trump.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

“Kavanaugh was talking about why an incumbent president should not be distracted by ongoing criminal prosecutions or investigations… Kavanaugh I don’t think wants to be associated with this ‘absolute immunity’ argument that they’re making so it actually might turn him off.”

2/ Here's my discussion with @ErinBurnett on how Trump's brief to Supreme Court on presidential immunity might be smart to cite Justice Kavanaugh's prior writing – but not if it takes his writing out of context.

Kavanaugh wrote a former president is not immune from prosecution pic.twitter.com/TDNtiH3rtH

— Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) March 20, 2024

Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Sponsored How Generative AI Will Improve Legal Service Delivery Learn how emerging tools will likely change and enhance the work of lawyers for years to come in this new report. From Thomson Reuters   Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace Sponsored Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace How to best leverage generative AI as an early adopter with ethical use. From LexisNexis   How AI Is The Catalyst For Reshaping Every Aspect Of Legal Work Sponsored How AI Is The Catalyst For Reshaping Every Aspect Of Legal Work Findings from the "Future of Professionals Report," based on a survey of 1,200 professionals from North and South America and the UK. From THOMSON REUTERS   Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace Sponsored Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace How to best leverage generative AI as an early adopter with ethical use. From LexisNexis  

The Trump team really stepped in it with this one — and what a public way to fail.

Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @[email protected].

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); }); Sponsored Profit Powerhouse: Elevating Law Firm Financial Performance Sponsored Profit Powerhouse: Elevating Law Firm Financial Performance In this CLE-eligible webinar on April 10th, we’ll explore the most common accounting pitfalls and how to avoid them for your firm. From Pilot and Above The Law   This AI-Powered Document Tool Will Meet You Where You Are Sponsored This AI-Powered Document Tool Will Meet You Where You Are Lexis Create provides simple access to internal and external knowledge — directly within Microsoft Word. From Ethan Beberness   Topics

Brett Kavanaugh, Courts, Donald Trump, Supreme Court


Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

Originally posted on: https://abovethelaw.com/2024/03/trump-attorneys-try-to-pander-to-justice-kavanaugh-fail/