Trump Lawyers: RTs Aren’t Endorsements, So, No Contempt, Your Honor!

// Donald Trump WikipediaThey haven’t even picked a jury yet for his New York criminal case, and Donald Trump is doing his damnedest to get himself held in contempt.

His in-court antics — falling asleep, playing on his phone, refusing to stand and face the potential jurors, being fed a constant stream of happy news by a young woman toting a wireless printer — might do it for a normal defendant. But the former president’s extrajudicial statements have clearly violated the gag order imposed by the court, forcing his lawyers to make ever more ridiculous claims to defend him, even before next week’s contempt hearing.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); });

The gag order imposed by Justice Juan Merchan on March 26 barred the defendant from “making or directing others to make public statements” regarding witnesses, line prosecutors, court staff, and jurors, along with family members of the above parties. After Trump pivoted to attacking Justice Merchan’s daughter, it was later expanded to include family members of the judge and District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance Sponsored Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance In this CLE-eligible webinar, we’ll explore the most common accounting pitfalls and how to avoid them for your firm. From Pilot and Above The Law  

Since then, Trump has honored the edict more in the breach than in the observance. He called Michael Cohen a “disgraced attorney and felon” who has been “prosecuted for LYING,” and quoted Michael Avenatti — also a disgraced attorney and felon! — calling Cohen and Stormy Daniels sleazebags. In the main, however, his strategy has been to link to or screenshot other people saying things which he himself would be barred from saying under the gag order.

Link to NY Post article saying

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); });

Apparently emboldened by the court’s lackadaisical response to his prior violations, Trump went even further on Wednesday, simply slapping quotation marks around an attack on the jury and attributing it to Jesse Watters, the simpering douchebag who took over Tucker Carlson’s slot after proving to Fox’s bosses that he was equally troll-y, but insufficiently influential to spark a major lawsuit.

Trump social media post: “They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury,” Jesse Watters

Sponsored The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm Sponsored The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm ChatGPT ushers in the age of generative AI – even for law firms. From THOMSON REUTERS   Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance Sponsored Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance In this CLE-eligible webinar, we’ll explore the most common accounting pitfalls and how to avoid them for your firm. From Pilot and Above The Law   Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now Sponsored Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now If 2023 introduced legal professionals to generative AI, then 2024 will be when law firms start adapting to utilize it. Things are moving fast, so… From LexisNexis   The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm Sponsored The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm ChatGPT ushers in the age of generative AI – even for law firms. From THOMSON REUTERS  

There is no universe in which this isn’t a direct violation of the prohibition on public statements about prospective jurors. And, as if to highlight the dangers from Trump’s rhetoric, the morning started with one of the jurors seated yesterday requesting to be excused after being immediately doxxed thanks to the media’s detailed reporting of her biographical details. (Since then the media has decided that it’s not strictly necessary to report the eye color, maiden name, and date of last menstrual period for each individual juror.)

The prosecutors argued that Trump had violated the gag order seven times since they’d moved for a hearing on the matter.

“It’s ridiculous and it has to stop,” Assistant District Attorney Chris Conroy complained, adding that the reference to jurors was “the most disturbing post, especially in light of this morning.”

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); });

Trump’s lawyer Emil Bove, who spent a decade in the US Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York and now pretends to have fallen off the turnip truck yesterday, insisted that the order was somehow ambiguous when it came to Trump reposting content generated by others.

“President Trump’s responses are political in nature. They’re intended to defend against what Mr. Cohen is saying… the gag order didn’t prohibit responding to political attacks,” Bove said, according to the Daily Beast. “One other thing. Only recently … has DA taken the position that reposting statements by others violates the gag order.”

Sponsored Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace Sponsored Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace How to best leverage generative AI as an early adopter with ethical use. From LexisNexis   Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve Sponsored Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve The rise of remote work has dramatically reshaped the relationship between Lawyers and Law Firms, see how Scale LLP has taken the steps to get… From The Team at Scale LLP  

Bove even went so far as to credit his client with “bring[ing] to light some of the ambiguities in the order.”

You know … for the sake of fleshing out the issues!

This was marginally less stupid than Tuesday when Todd Blanche, Trump’s lead attorney, invented a “responding to salacious, repeated vehement attacks by these witnesses” exception to the order. But it will be interesting to see these guys put that in writing when they brief the contempt issue Friday.

Maybe they can get their client to help with the drafting. He seems super familiar with New York criminal procedure.

I thought STRIKES were supposed to be “unlimited” when we were picking our jury? I was then told we only had 10, not nearly enough when we were purposely given the 2nd Worst Venue in the Country. Don’t worry, we have the First Worst also, as the Witch Hunt continues! ELECTION INTERFERENCE!

People v. Trump [Case Documents via Just Security]

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she produces the Law and Chaos substack and podcast.

Topics

Courts, Donald Trump, Government, Juan Merchan


Introducing Jobbguru: Your Gateway to Career Success

The ultimate job platform is designed to connect job seekers with their dream career opportunities. Whether you're a recent graduate, a seasoned professional, or someone seeking a career change, Jobbguru provides you with the tools and resources to navigate the job market with ease. 

Take the next step in your career with Jobbguru:

Don't let the perfect job opportunity pass you by. Join Jobbguru today and unlock a world of career possibilities. Start your journey towards professional success and discover your dream job with Jobbguru.

Originally posted on: https://abovethelaw.com/2024/04/trump-lawyers-rts-arent-endorsements-so-no-contempt-your-honor/