//

(Photo by Theo Wargo/Getty Images for TIME)

Let’s get to it. Elon got the reins of Twitter and immediately started with firing people and trying to turn the verification system into a cash cow. Thanks to Stephen King’s adept haggling skills, the price of per month verification dropped from $20 to $8. But the problem of pricing verification goes beyond the nickel and diming. Fundamentally, it is a matter of principle.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-top-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

someone just told STEPHEN KING, one of the most iconic authors of all time, that twitters verification check is the only reason he’s relevant.
how is twitter even real omg pic.twitter.com/JXFDDHRchm

— kie (@criminalplaza) October 31, 2022

Sponsored Shifting Dynamics: A New Era of L&E Related Legal Matters How can legal leaders continue to cost-effectively address L&E investigations in this current economic climate? Join us on November 17th to find out. From Axiom and Above The Law

Are online tweeters actually who they claim to be? The switch from a verification system that checks who you really are to one that checks to see if you really paid your tithe this week has some drawbacks… and people were quick to elucidate Musk on what those are.

Actor Valerie Bertinelli impersonated Elon Musk on Twitter this weekend, posting and retweeting in support of Democratic candidates under the guise to make a point about his newly proposed verification system.

Bertinelli first changed her name on Saturday, shortly after Twitter rolled out the billionaire’s controversial paid-verification system, which requires users to shell out $7.99 a month to receive a blue checkmark.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-middle-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-storycontent-440x100" ); googletag.enableServices(); }); googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-in-story-youtube-1x1" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

This was, of course, as hilarious as it was effective. For people who just don’t read, it was pretty easy to mistake Bertinelli’s tweets for Elon’s. This wouldn’t be an issue for Twitter if the person imitating someone else was just slaying slurs, like so:

Sponsored Sponsored PD Appreciation Month: Professional Development & Business Development Mixer 2022 Recent workplace changes like remote work or quiet quitting highlight the value of business and career development training for all legal industry professionals. From Practising Law Institute Sponsored The Lawyer's Guide to a Comprehensive Open Source Compliance Program Join us on November 16th to uncover the key ingredients of a comprehensive, effective, and efficient compliance program. From Fossa and Above The Law Sponsored Investing In Mental Health Can Show Concrete ROI. Here’s How. Ways to see proven ROI from a workplace mental health program From Spring Health and Above The Law Sponsored PD Appreciation Month: Professional Development & Business Development Mixer 2022 Recent workplace changes like remote work or quiet quitting highlight the value of business and career development training for all legal industry professionals. From Practising Law Institute

This is, of course, not Billie Eilish. The verified person, King_Staccz (who is currently impersonating Kanye West) is the one who actually tweeted this. He changed his name and profile picture to make it look like the singer to put slurs in a white woman’s digital mouth.

Bertinelli’s tweets were a problem because they imitated Elon Musk and said some very wild and inappropriate things. Like… people should vote.

Over the next several hours, the actor posted and retweeted dozens of tweets in support of Democratic candidates ahead of midterm elections Tuesday.

As “Elon Musk,” she posted hashtags like #VoteBlueToProtectYourRights and shared tweets supporting gubernatorial candidates Gretchen Whitmore in Michigan and Beto O’Rourke in Texas, among others.

As other users pointed out, many of the tweets on their feed appeared as if Musk himself had actually retweeted them.

googletag.cmd.push( function() { // Enable lazy loading. googletag.pubads().enableLazyLoad({ renderMarginPercent: 150, mobileScaling: 2 }); // Display ad. googletag.display( "div-id-for-bottom-300x250" ); googletag.enableServices(); });

In solidarity, others also fucked around a la Bertinelli. Unfortunately, Kathy Griffin was one of the few who also found out.

OMG lol pic.twitter.com/AjGLRjFxGF

— Pope of Muskanity (@RationalEtienne) November 6, 2022

Sponsored Sponsored Shifting Dynamics: A New Era of L&E Related Legal Matters How can legal leaders continue to cost-effectively address L&E investigations in this current economic climate? Join us on November 17th to find out. From Axiom and Above The Law Sponsored Law Firms Find Balance In Shifting Talent War With Timely Resource Insights As legal demand and firm capacities fluctuate, firm leaders must find ways to provide clients with swift and responsive legal services and prioritize lawyer work-life… From BigHand

RIP to comedy on Twitter 😭 pic.twitter.com/fuO6nF6Oea

— CardboardTier – STREAMS AT NIGHT NOW 🥵 (@CardboardTier) November 6, 2022

The gold nugget in all of this is that the satire supercharged the argument and he would’ve been better off leaving good alone. Blue checks verifying one’s identity means something — you know who you’re reading (assuming you bother to look at the handle) — a world where it just means you spend $8 a month takes away the verification that the check once conveyed. You know, maybe Elon would have been appreciative of how demonstrative this bit of trolling was if he would have read The Onion’s brief on the significance of good parody before he started swinging the ban hammer.

Wow. The guy who claimed to bring comedy to Twitter can't take a joke.
Hilariously using the profile of the guy who ruined blue checks to prove the point that the blue check protects people from impersonation and fake accounts was brilliant satire and endlessly amusing.

— Trussia (@yogaskidogs) November 6, 2022

From The Onion’s Amicus Brief:

It really is an old trick. The word “parody” stretches back to the Hellenic world. It originates in the prefix para, meaning an alteration, and the suffix ode, referring to the poetry form known as an ode. One of its earliest practitioners was the first-century B.C. poet Horace, whose Satires would replicate the exact form known as an ode—mimicking its meter, its subject matter, even its self-serious tone—but tweaking it ever so slightly so that the form was able to mock its own idiocies.

This is not a mere linguistic anecdote. The point is instead that without the capacity to fool someone, parody is functionally useless, deprived of the tools inscribed in its very etymology that allow it, again and again, to perform this rhetorically powerful sleight-of-hand: It adopts a particular form in order to critique it from within. See Farah v. Esquire Magazine, 736 F.3d 528, 536 (D.C. Cir. 2013). Parody leverages the expectations that are created in readers when they see something written in a particular form…[t]he power of the parody arises from that dissonance into which the reader has been drawn. Farah, 736 F.3d at 537.

Tl;dr: Free Speech McGee here not only outlawed parody — one of the oldest forms of comedy — less than two weeks after he caged the bird, his use of permanent bans to do so undermines the notion that Twitter is a public square where everyone can voice their opinion. That’s not me pushing an agenda, he really said that:

https://t.co/0O3kF4v1Oz pic.twitter.com/KE7dFciaHf

— Jack Fifield (@jackfifield) November 6, 2022

Some struggling author is fuming right now because their genre bending dystopian novel about a world where a billionaire buys the world’s largest means of communication as a vanity project under the cover of “broadening free speech,” only to immediately monetize it and use it to broadcast political opinions directly to the masses, will now read as trite.

Trash me all day, but it’ll cost $8

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 5, 2022

Always been the endgame here https://t.co/uTRzUHDkRp

— Elie Mystal (@ElieNYC) November 7, 2022

And if you thought the saving grace would be that the author would differ his dystopian fantasy from ours by imaging that the people would come to defend their new information overlord with bad legal takes to protect his fragile ego:

Free speech doesn't include impersonation..That's a literal federal crime

— KV Aditya (@the_madrid_guy) November 6, 2022

That’s right. Kathy Griffin changing her twitter display name to Elon Musk is being equated with a federal crime. Now that would make for an interesting “So what are you in for” conversation.

And for those of you that are like “Well, that’s just one guy saying that. Most people aren’t that stupid. Stop straw-manning,” explain this:

Did you just call making a parody account Identity theft? pic.twitter.com/uTloSaSClj

— FlyHighPhilly (@phillyhighh) November 6, 2022

Since Elon bought the app, not for his own self-aggrandizement, but for the betterment of the species — no, this isn’t me overindulging in hyperbole, he really said that — it is important to pay attention to the early signs of what that “betterment” and cultivation of “free speech” will look like:

free speech includes racism but not making fun of you

— brandon* (@brndxix) November 6, 2022

Again, not hyperbole — the free speech train got immediately more racist with Elon in the conductor’s seat.

In the week leading up to Musk's acquisition, researchers said there were no more than 84 hostile tweets an hour. But from midnight on October 28 to noon the next day, there were 4,778 hate-filled tweets. https://t.co/EA5JVPIoSz

— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 2, 2022

The data was of course brushed away by Chief Twit shortly after:

Again, to be crystal clear, Twitter’s strong commitment to content moderation remains absolutely unchanged.

In fact, we have actually seen hateful speech at times this week decline *below* our prior norms, contrary to what you may read in the press.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 4, 2022

I hope that someone updates the Don on Twitter’s new “Don’t hurt Big Elon’s feelies” policy when he logs back in on his formerly suspended account.

✅ You literally started a violent insurrection? Sure, we’d love to have you back.

❌ Made fun of Elon? You’re never coming back, it’s permanent.

— Hoodlum 🇺🇸 (@NotHoodlum) November 7, 2022

I’d try to come up with a snazzy summarizing sendoff, but I recognize the futility of reinventing the wheel — Jim M Felton said it best.

Quite funny watching you in real time figure out what verification was actually for

— James Felton (@JimMFelton) November 7, 2022

Valerie Bertinelli ‘Became’ Elon Musk, Trolled On Twitter To Prove Point About Blue-Check Verification System [Business Insider]

Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at [email protected] and by tweet at @WritesForRent.

Topics

Elon Musk, Free Speech, Stephen King, Technology, Twitter, Valerie Bertinelli, Verification